<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PCB-Solutions &#187; Thermal Conductivity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcb-solutions.com/blog/tag/thermal-conductivity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcb-solutions.com/blog</link>
	<description>Quality And Flexible PCB Solutions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2010 03:42:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>IPC Releases PCB Industry Results for June 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.pcb-solutions.com/blog/ipc-releases-pcb-industry-results-for-june-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcb-solutions.com/blog/ipc-releases-pcb-industry-results-for-june-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 19:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PCB Market Monitor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia PCB Supplier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conductive Epoxy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conductive silver filled epoxy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flex PCB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Injection Molding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCB Distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCB Material]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCB Prototype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCB Solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCB Surface Finishes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCB Tg Td Rating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polyimide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Printed Circuit Board Manufacturer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Printed Circuit Boards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PWB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rigid Flex PCB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RoHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheet metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surface Finishes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taliflex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thermal Conductivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vias]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcb-solutions.com/blog/?p=91</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good news for the industry continues to remain for the PCB and PCBA sectors. Key booking figures continue to be strong. Let&#8217;s hope it keeps rolling.
BANNOCKBURN, Ill., USA, July 26, 2010 — IPC — IPC — Association  Connecting  Electronics Industries® announced today the June  findings from its monthly North American Printed Circuit Board [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good news for the industry continues to remain for the PCB and PCBA sectors. Key booking figures continue to be strong. Let&#8217;s hope it keeps rolling.</p>
<p><strong>BANNOCKBURN, Ill., USA, July 26, 2010 </strong>— IPC — <a href="http://www.ipc.org/default.aspx" target="_blank">IPC — Association  Connecting  Electronics Industries</a>® announced today the June  findings from its monthly North American Printed Circuit Board (PCB)  Statistical Program.</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">PCB Industry Growth Rates and Book-to-Bill Ratios  Announced</span></strong><br />
Rigid PCB shipments were up 25.3 percent while  bookings increased  29.3 percent in June 2010 from June 2009. Year to date,  rigid PCB  shipments were up 19.3 percent and bookings have grown 35.0   percent. Compared to the previous month, rigid PCB shipments increased  13.7  percent and rigid bookings increased 9.7 percent. The book-to-bill  ratio for  the North American rigid PCB industry in June 2010 stood at  1.12.</p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://www.ipc.org/images/Industry%20Images/2010/Jun10Rigid-lg.gif" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.ipc.org/images/Industry%20Images/2010/Jun10Rigid.gif" alt="" /></a><br />
<a href="http://www.ipc.org/3.0_Industry/3.1_Industry_Data/2010/Jun2010.pdf" target="_blank">View all the charts in PDF</a></p>
<p>Flexible circuit shipments in June 2010 were up 14.8  percent,  and bookings were up 11.0 percent compared to June 2009. Year to date,   flexible circuit shipments increased 0.6 percent and bookings were up  15.5  percent. Compared to the previous month, flexible circuit  shipments went up 28.1  percent and flex bookings declined 2.7 percent.  The North American flexible  circuit book-to-bill ratio in June 2010  remained high at 1.15.</p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://www.ipc.org/images/Industry%20Images/2010/Jun10Flex-lg.gif" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.ipc.org/images/Industry%20Images/2010/Jun10Flex.gif" alt="" /></a><br />
<a href="http://www.ipc.org/3.0_Industry/3.1_Industry_Data/2010/Jun2010.pdf" target="_blank">View all the charts in PDF</a></p>
<p>For rigid PCBs and flexible circuits combined,  industry  shipments in June 2010 increased 24.4 percent from June 2009, as  orders  booked increased 27.8 percent from June 2009. Year to date, combined   industry shipments were up 17.6 percent and bookings were up 33.4  percent.  Compared to the previous month, combined industry shipments  for June 2010 increased  14.8 percent and bookings went up 8.6 percent.  The combined (rigid and flex)  industry book-to-bill ratio in June 2010  was 1.12.</p>
<p>“The book-to-bill ratios for both rigid PCBs and flexible  circuits remain well  above parity, which suggests a positive outlook  for the remainder of the year,”  said IPC President &amp; CEO Denny  McGuirk.   “Sales growth is stabilizing, but year-on-year growth in both  segments  is continuing in double digits,” he added.</p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://www.ipc.org/images/Industry%20Images/2010/Jun10btob-lg.gif" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.ipc.org/images/Industry%20Images/2010/Jun10btob.gif" alt="" /></a><br />
<a href="http://www.ipc.org/3.0_Industry/3.1_Industry_Data/2010/Jun2010.pdf" target="_blank">View all the charts in PDF</a></p>
<p>The  book-to-bill ratios are calculated by dividing the value  of orders booked over  the past three months by the value of sales  billed during the same period from  companies in IPC’s survey sample.  A   ratio of more than 1.00 suggests that current demand is ahead of  supply, which  is a positive indicator for sales growth over the next  two to three months.</p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://www.ipc.org/images/Industry%20Images/2010/Jun10pcb-lg.gif" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.ipc.org/images/Industry%20Images/2010/Jun10pcb.gif" alt="" /></a><br />
<a href="http://www.ipc.org/3.0_Industry/3.1_Industry_Data/2010/Jun2010.pdf" target="_blank">View all the charts in PDF</a></p>
<p>Book-to-bill  ratios and growth rates for rigid PCBs and  flexible circuits combined are  heavily affected by the rigid PCB  segment. Rigid PCBs represent an estimated 90  percent of the current  PCB industry in North America, according to IPC’s <em>World  PCB  Production and Laminate Market Report</em>.</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">The Role of Domestic Production</span></strong><br />
IPC’s  monthly survey of the North American PCB industry tracks  bookings and shipments  from U.S. and Canadian facilities, which provide  indicators of regional demand.  These numbers do not measure U.S. and  Canadian PCB production. To track  regional production trends, IPC asks  survey participants for the percent of  their reported shipments that  were produced domestically (i.e., in the USA or  Canada). In June 2010,  83 percent of total PCB shipments reported were  domestically produced.  Domestic production also accounted for 83 percent of  rigid PCB and 81  percent of flexible circuit shipments in June by IPC’s survey   participants. These numbers are significantly affected by the mix of  companies  in IPC’s survey sample, which changed slightly in January,  but are kept  constant through the remainder of the year.</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Bare Circuits Versus Assembly</span></strong><br />
Flexible  circuit sales typically include value-added services  such as assembly, in  addition to the bare flex circuits. In June, the  flexible circuit manufacturers  in IPC’s survey sample indicated that  bare circuits accounted for about 77  percent of their shipment value  reported for the month. Assembly and other  services make up a large and  growing segment of flexible circuit producers’  businesses. This figure  is also sensitive to changes in the survey sample,  which may occur at  the beginning of each calendar year.</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Interpreting the Data</span></strong><br />
Year-on-year  and year-to-date growth rates provide the most  meaningful view of industry  growth. Month-to-month comparisons should  be made with caution as they may  reflect cyclical effects. Because  bookings tend to be more volatile than  shipments, changes in the  book-to-bill ratios from month to month may not be  significant unless a  trend of more than three consecutive months is apparent.  It is also  important to consider changes in bookings and shipments to  understand  what is driving changes in the book-to-bill ratio.</p>
<p>The  information in IPC’s monthly PCB industry statistics is  based on data provided  by a representative sample of both rigid and  flexible PCB manufacturers in the  USA and Canada. IPC publishes the <a href="http://www.ipc.org/ContentPage.aspx?pageid=Current-Industry-Trends">PCB  Book-to-Bill Ratio</a> and the <a href="http://www.ipc.org/3.0_industry/3.1_industry_data/stat-prog-bro-09-WEB.pdf" target="_blank">PCB  Statistical Program Report</a> each month.  Statistics for the previous month are  not available until the last week  of the following month.</p>
<p><strong>Contact:</strong><br />
Sharon Starr, IPC Director of Market Research<br />
P:  <span>+1 847-597-2817</span><span dir="ltr"><span> begin_of_the_skype_highlighting</span> <span title="Call this  phone number in United States of America with Skype: +18475972817" dir="ltr"><span> </span><span title="Skype actions"><span style="background-position: -4499px 1px ! important;"> </span> </span><span><span> +1  847-597-2817</span></span><span> </span></span> <span>end_of_the_skype_highlighting</span></span><br />
E:  <a href="mailto:SharonStarr@ipc.org" target="_blank">SharonStarr@ipc.org</a></p>
<p># # #</p>
<p><strong>About IPC</strong><br />
IPC (<a href="http://www.ipc.org/">www.IPC.org</a>) is a global trade  association based  in Bannockburn, Ill., dedicated to the competitive  excellence and financial  success of its 2,700 member companies which  represent all facets of the  electronics industry, including design,  printed board manufacturing,  electronics assembly and test. As a  member-driven organization and leading  source for industry standards,  training, market research and public policy  advocacy, IPC supports  programs to meet the needs of an estimated $1.7 trillion  global  electronics industry. IPC  maintains additional offices in Taos, N.M.;  Arlington, Va.; Garden Grove,  Calif.; Stockholm, Sweden; Moscow,  Russia; and Shanghai and Shenzhen, China.</p>
<p>Please visit our home page at: <a href="../../">www.pcb-solutions.com</a> We are a supplier of Domestic and off-shore Rigid, Rigid-Flex and Flex Printed Circuit Boards (PCBs), Domestic Military PCBs, Domestic Tier I PCBA, Domestic Sheet Metal, Domestic Injection Molding and other Custom Fabricated Services.</p>
<p><a href="../pcb.html"><em>http://www.pcb-solutions.com/pcb.html</em></a><em> </em></p>
<p><a href="../flex.html"><em>http://www.pcb-solutions.com/flex.html</em></a><em> </em></p>
<address>James Brown </address>
<address>V.P. Sales &amp; Marketing</address>
<address>PCB Solutions, LLC</address>
<address><a href="mailto:bobn@pcb-solutions.com">jamesb@pcb-solutions.com</a></address>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcb-solutions.com/blog/ipc-releases-pcb-industry-results-for-june-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conductive vs. Non-Conductive Via Fill</title>
		<link>http://www.pcb-solutions.com/blog/conductive-vs-non-conductive-via-fill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcb-solutions.com/blog/conductive-vs-non-conductive-via-fill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 06:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia PCB Supplier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conductive Epoxy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conductive silver filled epoxy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flex PCB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military Printed Circuit Boards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Conductive Epoxy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCB Distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCB Material]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCB Prototype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCB Solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Printed Circuit Board Manufacturer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Printed Circuit Boards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rigid Flex PCB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RoHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thermal Conductivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vias]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcb-solutions.com/blog/?p=62</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As PCB designers face greater challenges with fine-pitch components, less real estate and greater need for thermal conductivity, the use of epoxy filled vias has become common.  With two very different options of non-conductive and conductive (silver filled) epoxy available, the question if which is best often leaves designers and engineers with a difficult decision [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As PCB designers face greater challenges with fine-pitch components, less real estate and greater need for thermal conductivity, the use of epoxy filled vias has become common.  With two very different options of non-conductive and conductive (silver filled) epoxy available, the question if which is best often leaves designers and engineers with a difficult decision to make.</p>
<p><strong>Conductive (Silver Filled) Epoxy:</strong></p>
<p>Conductive silver filled epoxy contains organic solvents which require storage at a temperature of less then 5 degrees C, and limit the shelf life of the material.  Because of this, many PCB factories do not stock this epoxy and purchase it in quantities needed for the order, which may cause delays in production.  The size of the silver balls in the epoxy can make filling smaller holes difficult and often lead to air pockets inside the hole, which will actually decrease the thermal conductivity of the hole.  If the air pockets are close to the surface, this can cause voids at the pad surface, leading to assembly issues.  As the CTE (Coefficient of Thermal Expansion) of Silver Filled epoxy can be very different from the CTE of high TG material used in lead free or ROHS assemblies, blistering of surface pads can be common, as well as lifted pads during high temperature soldering operations.</p>
<p>Silver filled epoxy reacts to process chemistry during metallization by expanding which will cause an uneven or swelled pad surface.  This creates the need to add an additional process of “planarization” of the pad surface which can be costly, time consuming and add to pad surface imperfections including dimples in the land pattern and voids that can outgas during assembly.</p>
<p><strong>Non-Conductive Epoxy:</strong></p>
<p>Non-Conductive epoxy is 100% solid epoxy material which usually yields good pad planarity for via-in-pad designs.  The lack of silver in the epoxy resin allows the process to be used on smaller holes, including micro-vias often down to as small as .004 inch.  The CTE (Coefficient of Thermal Expansion) of non-conductive epoxy is often very close to that of high TG material, meaning less issues with hole expansion during the assembly process.  This also allows Non-Conductive Epoxy to be used in sequential lamination processes to fill blind and buried vias.</p>
<p>Non-Conductive Epoxy usually exhibits very little shrinkage during the thermal curing process, which will yield good pad planarity and will not require a separate planarization process.   The flat surface of the pad after plating over the Non-Conductive Epoxy means less chance of lifting pads during the assembly process and greater rework ability.</p>
<p>As there are no temperature or shelf-life restrictions to Non-Conductive Epoxy fill, most PCB factories have a ready supply of the material in stack, thus eliminating production delays caused by material procurement.</p>
<p><strong>Effects on Thermal Conductivity:</strong></p>
<p>Improved thermal conductivity is often cites as the reason for choosing Conductive Epoxy Fill over Non-Conductive Epoxy fill.  It is true that pure silver has the highest thermal conductivity; however, when surrounded by epoxy the silver surfaces are insulated and there is no direct contact of the silver to effectively increase the thermal conductivity.  Additionally, the air pockets present when using Silver Filled Epoxy may also reduce the thermal conductivity.  A properly filled and capped plated through hole will have better thermal conductivity using Non-Conductive Epoxy fill in place of Conductive Silver fill.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusion:</strong></p>
<p>The development of improved formulations of Non-Conductive Epoxy fill have created an equal or superior bond to electroless copper and increased the Thermal Conduction of filled holes, while eliminating many of the manufacturing and assembly concerns with Conductive (Siler Filled) epoxy.  Due to the points raised above, PCB Solutions strongly recommends Non-Conductive Epoxy</p>
<p>Please visit our home page at: <a href="../../">www.pcb-solutions.com</a> We are a supplier of Domestic and off-shore Rigid, Rigid-Flex and Flex  Printed Circuit Boards (PCBs), Domestic Military PCBs, Domestic Tier I  PCBA, Domestic Sheet Metal, Domestic Injection Molding and other Custom  Fabricated Services.</p>
<address><a href="../pcb.html">http://www.pcb-solutions.com/pcb.html</a></address>
<address><a href="../flex.html">http://www.pcb-solutions.com/flex.html</a></address>
<address>
</address>
<address> </address>
<address> </address>
<address>Bob Neisis</address>
<address>Quality Manager</address>
<address>PCB Solutions, LLC</address>
<address><a href="mailto:bobn@pcb-solutions.com">bobn@pcb-solutions.com</a></address>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcb-solutions.com/blog/conductive-vs-non-conductive-via-fill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

